While the property is not his to sell, the Duke could conceivably vacate the property now to minimise his outgoings in the near future.
In 2003, Andrew signed a 75-year lease for the property for a one-off fee of £1million to the Crown Estate, the equivalent of around £250 a week.
The home which boasts 31 bedrooms would be worth at least £30million on the open market and is located just three miles from Windsor Castle where the Queen spent the Christmas period for the second year in a row due to Covid.
Prince Andrew can be seen sitting in the backseat of the Range Rover leaving Royal Lodge on Thursday
During his tenure at the property, which was the Queen Mother’s old home, Andrew has spent £7.5million on refurbishing, including the addition of an indoor swimming pool.
Andrew’s daughters Beatrice and Eugenie are grown up now, and no longer live at the property and instead live with their partners and children.
However, Andrew does not live alone in the spacious royal residence, and instead reportedly lives there with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, although they are believed to occupy separate wings of the house.
After stepping down from royal duties in 2019 following his BBC Newsnight interview, the Duke was allowed to remain in residence at Windsor Park.
Andrew can decide whether to engage with the American legal system to defend himself against the allegations.
Reports have suggested that the Duke could be facing an estimated £5million -£6million legal bill if he decides to fight the case and clear his name over the allegations levelled against him.
The Duke could also be looking at paying an undisclosed sum to Ms Giuffre if an out-of-court settlement is agreed.
Ms Giuffre, 38, alleges he s*xually abused her on three separate occasions in 2001 when she was a minor under US law.
The Duke of York has repeatedly denied her claims.
On Thursday morning, Andrew made his first public appearance since the judge ruled not to dismiss the case.
Images show the Duke sitting in the back seat of the vehicle while being driven from the property.
His lawyers had previously cited a 2009 settlement between convicted s*x offender Jeffrey Epstein and the Duke’s accuser, Virginia Giuffre, as grounds for the dismissal.
They argued Ms Giuffre had waived her right to pursue a claim against the royal.
However, Judge Kaplan said the case could continue, adding that this ruling did not determine the “truth or falsity” of Ms Giuffre’s complaint.
Source: EXPRESS CO UK